Saudi Arabia executed Abdullah al-Derazi, a man human rights groups said joined protests as a minor in 2011. The case drew global attention, raising concerns about Saudi Arabia executions and the treatment of protesters. Authorities convicted him of terrorism, but human rights organizations and UN experts called for his release.
According to the Saudi Press Agency, authorities carried out the execution in the Eastern Province. Al-Derazi faced the death sentence along with eight others for participating in the 2011 anti-government demonstrations. Amnesty International criticized the authorities, saying he exercised his right to protest against the treatment of minority Shia Muslims.
Observers reported that al-Derazi’s family learned of the execution only through social media. They received no official notice, could not say goodbye, and have not received his body. This lack of transparency sparked serious ethical and legal concerns worldwide. Furthermore, the Supreme Court secretly confirmed his death sentence, just as it did for Jalal al-Labbad in August.
Since the start of 2025, Saudi authorities executed at least 300 people. Analysts expect the total to surpass 338 executions in 2024, setting a new record. Out of these, 33 people faced execution for terrorism, while 202 were executed for drug-related offenses. These figures show the kingdom’s strict approach to internal security and law enforcement.
International organizations, including Amnesty International and the European Saudi Organisation for Human Rights, condemned the execution. They argued that executing individuals arrested as minors violates international law. They also urged Saudi authorities to change capital punishment policies for juvenile detainees.
The case of al-Derazi reignited debate over Saudi Arabia executions. Critics argue that the kingdom must ensure legal processes follow international standards and respect human rights. Meanwhile, supporters say the measures protect law and order.
In conclusion, Abdullah al-Derazi’s execution highlights ongoing controversies surrounding Saudi Arabia executions. The case underscores tensions between national security policies and global human rights expectations. It will likely continue attracting attention from watchdogs, governments, and activists monitoring capital punishment practices.
